Can Children Express Preference in IL Custody Proceedings?

A young boy in a suit and tie looks thoughtfully at a small golden scale of justice he is holding in his hand, set against a plain peach-colored background.

Navigating a divorce is tough enough, but when children are involved, the complexities multiply. Determining which parent will be primarily responsible for the child’s care is challenging. In most cases, parents require court intervention. A judge will weigh each parent’s take on the matter to establish an appropriate parenting time plan. However, you might be unaware that judges have the discretion to take the child’s custodial preference into account. Please continue reading as we explore how a child’s preference can impact custody rulings in Illinois and how an experienced Peoria County Child Custody Lawyer can fight for you.

Do Illinois Courts Take a Child’s Custodial Preference Into Account?

In Illinois custody cases, a judge can consider a child’s preference regarding parenting time. This is one of the factors used to determine the child’s “best interests”  and is mandated by 750 ILCS 5/602.7. The weight of this input depends on the child’s age, maturity level, and capacity to articulate a rational, independent rationale. 

It should be noted that there isn’t a universal age at which a child’s preference determines custody. Generally, the court gives more weight to the opinions on teenagers. Children below the age of 10 are usually not given as much weight due to:

  • Vulnerability to Manipulation: Younger children are easily led, influenced, or instructed by adults to state a specific custodial preference. 
  • Lack of Maturity: Younger children are often viewed as lacking the capacity to grasp the lasting repercussions of a final custody plan. 
  • Stability and Quality of Care: The court prioritizes the child’s security, consistency, and development over their expressed parental desire. 
  • Preventing Psychological Harm: Forcing a child to act as a tie-breaker in a custody dispute can inflict considerable emotional strain. 

The court has the discretion to disregard a child’s custodial preference if they believe it doesn’t serve the child’s best interests or if there is evidence that a parent coached or pressured the child. The child’s stated wish is merely one consideration among many. 

Do Children Have to Testify in Court?

When it comes to Illinois custody cases, children are not automatically required to testify in court about their custodial preference. The court’s primary concern is the child’s best interests. As such, they try to shield children from being placed in the middle of their parents’ conflict. 

To obtain the child’s perspective while minimizing emotional strain, judges commonly employ alternative strategies to testifying in court. These methods include in-camera interviews (private talks with the judge), appointing a Guardian ad Litem (GAL) to conduct an investigation and submit a report, or assigning a Child Representative (legal counsel advocates for the child). A child’s testimony is usually only deemed necessary in exceptional circumstances, such as cases involving abuse or when a mature child expresses a compelling preference. 

Contact Butler, Giraudo & Meister, P.C., today to ensure your child’s interests are protected.

Read Our

Recent Blogs

When is a Child Emancipated in Illinois?

Determining when a child is considered emancipated in Illinois is critical for parents, as it can significantly affect child support obligations. When a child…

Read More
Can Children Express Preference in IL Custody Proceedings?

Navigating a divorce is tough enough, but when children are involved, the complexities multiply. Determining which parent will be primarily responsible for the child’s…

Read More
Will My Clothing Impact My Illinois Divorce Court?

Attending a divorce hearing in Illinois can be stressful. You’ll want to focus mostly on your case, but keep in mind how you look…

Read More

Contact Us Today!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Group of attorneys